Paper detail

On the Use of Information Criteria for Subset Selection in Least Squares Regression

Least squares (LS)-based subset selection methods are popular in linear regression modeling. Best subset selection (BS) is known to be NP-hard and has a computational cost that grows exponentially with the number of predictors. Recently, Bertsimas (2016) formulated BS as a mixed integer optimization (MIO) problem and largely reduced the computation overhead by using a well-developed optimization solver, but the current methodology is not scalable to very large datasets. In this paper, we propose a novel LS-based method, the best orthogonalized subset selection (BOSS) method, which performs BS upon an orthogonalized basis of ordered predictors and scales easily to large problem sizes. Another challenge in applying LS-based methods in practice is the selection rule to choose the optimal subset size k. Cross-validation (CV) requires fitting a procedure multiple times, and results in a selected k that is random across repeated application to the same dataset. Compared to CV, information criteria only require fitting a procedure once, but they require knowledge of the effective degrees of freedom for the fitting procedure, which is generally not available analytically for complex methods. Since BOSS uses orthogonalized predictors, we first explore a connection for orthogonal non-random predictors between BS and its Lagrangian formulation (i.e., minimization of the residual sum of squares plus the product of a regularization parameter and k), and based on this connection propose a heuristic degrees of freedom (hdf) for BOSS that can be estimated via an analytically-based expression. We show in both simulations and real data analysis that BOSS using a proposed Kullback-Leibler based information criterion AICc-hdf has the strongest performance of all of the LS-based methods considered and is competitive with regularization methods, with the computational effort of a single ordinary LS fit.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.