Researcher profile

Clifford M. Hurvich

Clifford M. Hurvich contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

On the Use of Information Criteria for Subset Selection in Least Squares Regression

Least squares (LS)-based subset selection methods are popular in linear regression modeling. Best subset selection (BS) is known to be NP-hard and has a computational cost that grows exponentially with the number of predictors. Recently, Bertsimas (2016) formulated BS as a mixed integer optimization (MIO) problem and largely reduced the computation overhead by using a well-developed optimization solver, but the current methodology is not scalable to very large datasets. In this paper, we propose a novel LS-based method, the best orthogonalized subset selection (BOSS) method, which performs BS upon an orthogonalized basis of ordered predictors and scales easily to large problem sizes. Another challenge in applying LS-based methods in practice is the selection rule to choose the optimal subset size k. Cross-validation (CV) requires fitting a procedure multiple times, and results in a selected k that is random across repeated application to the same dataset. Compared to CV, information criteria only require fitting a procedure once, but they require knowledge of the effective degrees of freedom for the fitting procedure, which is generally not available analytically for complex methods. Since BOSS uses orthogonalized predictors, we first explore a connection for orthogonal non-random predictors between BS and its Lagrangian formulation (i.e., minimization of the residual sum of squares plus the product of a regularization parameter and k), and based on this connection propose a heuristic degrees of freedom (hdf) for BOSS that can be estimated via an analytically-based expression. We show in both simulations and real data analysis that BOSS using a proposed Kullback-Leibler based information criterion AICc-hdf has the strongest performance of all of the LS-based methods considered and is competitive with regularization methods, with the computational effort of a single ordinary LS fit.

preprint2020arXiv

Selection of Regression Models under Linear Restrictions for Fixed and Random Designs

Many important modeling tasks in linear regression, including variable selection (in which slopes of some predictors are set equal to zero) and simplified models based on sums or differences of predictors (in which slopes of those predictors are set equal to each other, or the negative of each other, respectively), can be viewed as being based on imposing linear restrictions on regression parameters. In this paper, we discuss how such models can be compared using information criteria designed to estimate predictive measures like squared error and Kullback-Leibler (KL) discrepancy, in the presence of either deterministic predictors (fixed-X) or random predictors (random-X). We extend the justifications for existing fixed-X criteria Cp, FPE and AICc, and random-X criteria Sp and RCp, to general linear restrictions. We further propose and justify a KL-based criterion, RAICc, under random-X for variable selection and general linear restrictions. We show in simulations that the use of the KL-based criteria AICc and RAICc results in better predictive performance and sparser solutions than the use of squared error-based criteria, including cross-validation.