Paper detail

On the robustness of the minimum $\ell_2$ interpolator

We analyse the interpolator with minimal $\ell_2$-norm $\hatβ$ in a general high dimensional linear regression framework where $\mathbb Y=\mathbb Xβ^*+ξ$ where $\mathbb X$ is a random $n\times p$ matrix with independent $\mathcal N(0,Σ)$ rows and without assumption on the noise vector $ξ\in \mathbb R^n$. We prove that, with high probability, the prediction loss of this estimator is bounded from above by $(\|β^*\|^2_2r_{cn}(Σ)\vee \|ξ\|^2)/n$, where $r_{k}(Σ)=\sum_{i\geq k}λ_i(Σ)$ are the rests of the sum of eigenvalues of $Σ$. These bounds show a transition in the rates. For high signal to noise ratios, the rates $\|β^*\|^2_2r_{cn}(Σ)/n$ broadly improve the existing ones. For low signal to noise ratio, we also provide lower bound holding with large probability. Under assumptions on the sprectrum of $Σ$, this lower bound is of order $\| ξ\|_2^2/n$, matching the upper bound. Consequently, in the large noise regime, we are able to precisely track the prediction error with large probability. This results give new insight when the interpolation can be harmless in high dimensions.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.