Paper detail

On the molecular nature of the $Ω_c(3120)$ and its analogy with the $Ω(2012)$

We make a study of the $Ω_c(3120)$, one of the five $Ω_c$ states observed by the LHCb collaboration, which is well reproduced as a molecular state from the $Ξ^*_c \bar K$ and $Ω^*_c η$ channels mostly. The state with $J^P = 3/2^-$ decays to $Ξ_c \bar K$ in $D$-wave and we include this decay channel in our approach, as well as the effect of the $Ξ^*_c$ width. With all these ingredients, we determine the fraction of the $Ω_c(3120)$ width that goes into $Ξ_c π\bar K$, which could be a measure of the $Ξ^*_c \bar K$ molecular component, but due to a relatively big binding, compared to its analogous $Ω(2012)$ state, we find only a small fraction of about 3%, which makes this measurement difficult with present statistics. As an alternative, we evaluate the scattering length and effective range of the $Ξ^*_c \bar K$ and $Ω^*_c η$ channels which together with the binding and width of the $Ω_c(3120)$ state, could give us an answer to the issue of the compositeness of this state when these magnitudes are determined experimentally, something feasible nowadays, for instance, measuring correlation functions.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.