Paper detail

On the Inherent Dose-Reduction Potential of Classical Ghost Imaging

Classical ghost imaging is a computational imaging technique that employs patterned illumination. It is very similar in concept to the single-pixel camera in that an image may be reconstructed from a set of measurements even though all imaging quanta that pass through that sample are never recorded with a position resolving detector. The method was first conceived and applied for visible-wavelength photons and was subsequently translated to other probes such as x rays, atomic beams, electrons and neutrons. In the context of ghost imaging using penetrating probes that enable transmission measurement, we here consider several questions relating to the achievable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This is compared with the SNR for conventional imaging under scenarios of constant radiation dose and constant experiment time, considering both photon shot-noise and per-measurement electronic read-out noise. We show that inherent improved SNR capabilities of ghost imaging are limited to a subset of these scenarios and are actually due to increased dose (Fellgett advantage). An explanation is also presented for recent results published in the literature that are not consistent with these findings.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.