Paper detail

On the growth of the optimal constants of the multilinear Bohnenblust--Hille inequality

Let $(K_{n})_{n=1}^{\infty}$ be the optimal constants satisfying the multilinear (real or complex) Bohnenblust--Hille inequality. The exact values of the constants $K_{n}$ are still waiting to be discovered since eighty years ago; recently, it was proved that $(K_{n})_{n=1}^{\infty}$ has a subexponential growth. In this note we go a step further and address the following question: Is it true that \[ \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}(K_{n}-K_{n-1}) =0? \] Our main result is a Dichotomy Theorem for the constants satisfying the Bohnenblust--Hille inequality; in particular we show that the answer to the above problem is essentially positive in a sense that will be clear along the note. Another consequence of the dichotomy proved in this note is that $(K_{n})_{n=1}^{\infty}$ has a kind of subpolynomial growth: if $p(n)$ is any non-constant polynomial, then $K_{n}$ \textit{is} \textit{not} asymptotically equal to $p(n).$ Moreover, if \[ q>\log_{2}(\frac{e^{1-1/2γ}}{\sqrt{2}}) \approx0.526, \] then \[ K_{n}\nsim n^{q}. \]

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.