Paper detail

On posterior concentration rates for Bayesian quantile regression based on the misspecified asymmetric Laplace likelihood

The asymmetric Laplace density (ALD) is used as a working likelihood for Bayesian quantile regression. Sriram et al.(2013) derived posterior consistency for Bayesian linear quantile regression based on the misspecified ALD. While their paper also argued for $\sqrt{n}-$consistency, Sriram and Ramamoorthi (2017) highlighted that the argument was only valid for a rate less than $\sqrt{n}$. So, the question of $\sqrt{n}-$rate has remained unaddressed, but is necessary to carry out meaningful Bayesian inference based on the ALD. In this paper, we derive results to obtain posterior consistency rates for Bayesian quantile regression based on the misspecified ALD. We derive our results in a slightly general setting where the quantile function can possibly be non-linear. In particular, we give sufficient conditions for $\sqrt{n}-$consistency for the Bayesian linear quantile regression using ALD. We also provide examples of Bayesian non-linear quantile regression.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.