BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

R. V. Ramamoorthi

R. V. Ramamoorthi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.STStatistics Theorystat.OT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

On posterior concentration rates for Bayesian quantile regression based on the misspecified asymmetric Laplace likelihood

The asymmetric Laplace density (ALD) is used as a working likelihood for Bayesian quantile regression. Sriram et al.(2013) derived posterior consistency for Bayesian linear quantile regression based on the misspecified ALD. While their paper also argued for $\sqrt{n}-$consistency, Sriram and Ramamoorthi (2017) highlighted that the argument was only valid for a rate less than $\sqrt{n}$. So, the question of $\sqrt{n}-$rate has remained unaddressed, but is necessary to carry out meaningful Bayesian inference based on the ALD. In this paper, we derive results to obtain posterior consistency rates for Bayesian quantile regression based on the misspecified ALD. We derive our results in a slightly general setting where the quantile function can possibly be non-linear. In particular, we give sufficient conditions for $\sqrt{n}-$consistency for the Bayesian linear quantile regression using ALD. We also provide examples of Bayesian non-linear quantile regression.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On Posterior Concentration in Misspecified Models

We investigate the asymptotic behavior of Bayesian posterior distributions under independent and identically distributed ($i.i.d.$) misspecified models. More specifically, we study the concentration of the posterior distribution on neighborhoods of $f^{\star}$, the density that is closest in the Kullback--Leibler sense to the true model $f_0$. We note, through examples, the need for assumptions beyond the usual Kullback--Leibler support assumption. We then investigate consistency with respect to a general metric under three assumptions, each based on a notion of divergence measure, and then apply these to a weighted $L_1$-metric in convex models and non-convex models. Although a few results on this topic are available, we believe that these are somewhat inaccessible due, in part, to the technicalities and the subtle differences compared to the more familiar well-specified model case. One of our goals is to make some of the available results, especially that of , more accessible. Unlike their paper, our approach does not require construction of test sequences. We also discuss a preliminary extension of the $i.i.d.$ results to the independent but not identically distributed ($i.n.i.d.$) case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A Conversation with James Hannan

Jim Hannan is a professor who has lived an interesting life and one whose fundamental research in repeated games was not fully appreciated until late in his career. During his service as a meteorologist in the Army in World War II, Jim played poker and made weather forecasts. It is curious that his later research included strategies for repeated play that apply to selecting the best forecaster. James Hannan was born in Holyoke, Massachusetts on September 14, 1922. He attended St. Jerome's High School and in January 1943 received the Ph.B. from St. Michael's College in Colchester, Vermont. Jim enlisted in the US Army Air Force to train and serve as a meteorologist. This took him to army airbases in China by the close of the war. Following discharge from the army, Jim studied mathematics at Harvard and graduated with the M.S. in June 1947. To prepare for doctoral work in statistics at the University of North Carolina that fall, Jim went to the University of Michigan in the summer of 1947. The routine admissions' physical revealed a spot on the lung and the possibility of tuberculosis. This caused Jim to stay at Ann Arbor through the fall of 1947 and then at a Veterans Administration Hospital in Framingham, Massachusetts to have his condition followed more closely. He was discharged from the hospital in the spring and started his study at Chapel Hill in the fall of 1948. There he began research in compound decision theory under Herbert Robbins. Feeling the need for teaching experience, Jim left Chapel Hill after two years and short of thesis to take a three year appointment as an instructor at Catholic University in Washington, DC. When told that renewal was not coming, Jim felt pressure to finish his degree.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access