Abstract

Let AQA_{Q} be the self-adjoint operator defined by the QQ-function Q:z↦QzQ:z\mapsto Q_{z} through the Krein-like resolvent formula (−AQ+z)−1=(−A0+z)−1+GzWQz−1VGzˉ∗ ,z∈ZQ ,(-A_{Q}+z)^{-1}= (-A_{0}+z)^{-1}+G_{z}WQ_{z}^{-1}VG_{\bar z}^{*}\,,\quad z\in Z_{Q}\,, where VV and WW are bounded operators and ZQ:={z∈ρ(A0):Qz and Qzˉ have a bounded inverse} .Z_{Q}:=\{z\inρ(A_{0}):\text{$Q_{z}$ and $Q_{\bar z }$ have a bounded inverse}\}\,. We show that ZQ≠∅⟹ZQ=ρ(A0)∩ρ(AQ) .Z_{Q}\not=\emptyset\quad\Longrightarrow\quad Z_{Q}=ρ(A_{0})\cap ρ(A_{Q})\,. We do not suppose that QQ is represented in terms of a uniformly strict, operator-valued Nevanlinna function (equivalently, we do not assume that QQ is associated to an ordinary boundary triplet), thus our result extends previously known ones. The proof relies on simple algebraic computations stemming from the first resolvent identity.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.