Paper detail

On Falconer's formula for the generalised Renyi dimension of a self-affine measure

We investigate a formula of K. Falconer which describes the typical value of the generalised Rényi dimension, or generalised $q$-dimension, of a self-affine measure in terms of the linear components of the affinities. We show that in contrast to a related formula for the Hausdorff dimension of a typical self-affine set, the value of the generalised $q$-dimension predicted by Falconer's formula varies discontinuously as the linear parts of the affinities are changed. Conditionally on a conjecture of J. Bochi and B. Fayad, we show that the value predicted by this formula for pairs of two-dimensional affine transformations is discontinuous on a set of positive Lebesgue measure. These discontinuities derive from discontinuities of the lower spectral radius which were previously observed by the author and J. Bochi.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.