Paper detail

On a version of the slicing problem for the surface area of convex bodies

We study the slicing inequality for the surface area instead of volume. This is the question whether there exists a constant $α_n$ depending (or not) on the dimension $n$ so that $$S(K)\leqα_n|K|^{\frac{1}{n}}\max_{ξ\in S^{n-1}}S(K\capξ^{\perp })$$ where $S$ denotes surface area and $|\cdot |$ denotes volume. For any fixed dimension we provide a negative answer to this question, as well as to a weaker version in which sections are replaced by projections onto hyperplanes. We also study the same problem for sections and projections of lower dimension and for all the quermassintegrals of a convex body. Starting from these questions, we also introduce a number of natural parameters relating volume and surface area, and provide optimal upper and lower bounds for them. Finally, we show that, in contrast to the previous negative results, a variant of the problem which arises naturally from the surface area version of the equivalence of the isomorphic Busemann--Petty problem with the slicing problem has an affirmative answer.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.