Paper detail

On a correspondence between classical and quantum particle systems

An exact correspondence is established between a $N$-body classical interacting system and a $N-1$-body quantum system with respect to the partition function. The resulting quantum-potential is a $N-1$-body one. Inversely the Kelbg potential is reproduced which describes quantum systems at a quasi-classical level. The found correspondence between classical and quantum systems allows also to approximate dense classical many body systems by lower order quantum perturbation theory replacing Planck's constant properly by temperature and density dependent expressions. As an example the dynamical behaviour of an one - component plasma is well reproduced concerning the formation of correlation energy after a disturbance utilising solely the analytical quantum - Born result for dense degenerated Fermi systems. As a practical guide the quantum - Bruckner parameter $r_s$ has been replaced by the classical plasma parameter $Γ$ as $r_s\approx0.3 Γ^{3/2}$

preprint2001arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.