Paper detail

On a Bellman function associated with the Chang--Wilson--Wolff theorem: a case study

In this paper we estimate the tail of distribution (i.e., the measure of the set $\{f\ge x\}$) for those functions $f$ whose dyadic square function is bounded by a given constant. In particular we get a bit better estimate than the estimate following from the Chang--Wilson--Wolf theorem. In the paper we investigate the Bellman function corresponding to the problem. A curious structure of this function is found: it has jumps of the first derivative at a dense subset of interval $[0,1]$ (where it is calculated exactly), but it is of $C^\infty$-class for $x>\sqrt3$ (where it is calculated up to a multiplicative constant). An unusual feature of the paper consists in the usage of computer calculations in the proof. Nevertheless, all the proofs are quite rigorous, since only the integer arithmetic was assigned to computer.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.