Paper detail

NVMExplorer: A Framework for Cross-Stack Comparisons of Embedded Non-Volatile Memories

Repeated off-chip memory accesses to DRAM drive up operating power for data-intensive applications, and SRAM technology scaling and leakage power limits the efficiency of embedded memories. Future on-chip storage will need higher density and energy efficiency, and the actively expanding field of emerging, embeddable non-volatile memory (eNVM) technologies is providing many potential candidates to satisfy this need. Each technology proposal presents distinct trade-offs in terms of density, read, write, and reliability characteristics, and we present a comprehensive framework for navigating and quantifying these design trade-offs alongside realistic system constraints and application-level impacts. This work evaluates eNVM-based storage for a range of application and system contexts including machine learning on the edge, graph analytics, and general purpose cache hierarchy, in addition to describing a freely available (http://nvmexplorer.seas.harvard.edu/) set of tools for application experts, system designers, and device experts to better understand, compare, and quantify the next generation of embedded memory solutions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.