Paper detail

Nuclear constraints on properties of neutron star crusts

The transition density $ρ_{t}$ and pressure $P_{t}$ at the inner edge separating the liquid core from the solid crust of neutron stars are systematically studied using a modified Gogny (MDI) and 47 popular Skyrme interactions within well established dynamical and thermodynamical methods. It is shown that the widely used parabolic approximation to the full Equation of State (EOS) of isospin asymmetric nuclear matter may lead to huge errors in estimating the ρ_{t} and P_{t}, especially for stiffer symmetry energy functionals $E_{sym}(ρ)$. The ρ_{t} and P_{t} decrease roughly linearly with the increasing slope parameter $L$ of the $E_{sym}(ρ)$ using the full EOS within both methods. It is also shown that the thickness, fractional mass and moment of inertia of neutron star crust are all very sensitive to the parameter $L$ through the $ρ_{t}$. Moreover, it is shown that the $E_{sym}(ρ)$ constrained in the same sub-saturation density range as the neutron star crust by the isospin diffusion data in heavy-ion collisions at intermediate energies limits the transition density and pressure to 0.040$ fm^-3}< ρ_{t} < 0.065$ fm^-3 and 0.01 MeV/fm^3 < P_{t} < 0.26$ MeV/fm^3, respectively. These constrained values for the transition density and pressure are significantly lower than their fiducial values currently used in the literature. Furthermore, the mass-radius relation and several other properties closely related to the neutron star crust are studied by using the MDI interaction. It is found that the newly constrained $ρ_t$ and $P_t$ together with the earlier estimate of $ΔI/I>0.014$ for the crustal fraction of the moment of inertia of the Vela pulsar impose a stringent constraint of R>= 4.7+4.0M/M_sun km for the radius $R$ and mass $M$ of neutron stars.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.