Paper detail

Nonparametric Regression Estimation Based on Spatially Inhomogeneous Data: Minimax Global Convergence Rates and Adaptivity

We consider the nonparametric regression estimation problem of recovering an unknown response function f on the basis of spatially inhomogeneous data when the design points follow a known compactly supported density g with a finite number of well separated zeros. In particular, we consider two different cases: when g has zeros of a polynomial order and when g has zeros of an exponential order. These two cases correspond to moderate and severe data losses, respectively. We obtain asymptotic minimax lower bounds for the global risk of an estimator of f and construct adaptive wavelet nonlinear thresholding estimators of f which attain those minimax convergence rates (up to a logarithmic factor in the case of a zero of a polynomial order), over a wide range of Besov balls. The spatially inhomogeneous ill-posed problem that we investigate is inherently more difficult than spatially homogeneous problems like, e.g., deconvolution. In particular, due to spatial irregularity, assessment of minimax global convergence rates is a much harder task than the derivation of minimax local convergence rates studied recently in the literature. Furthermore, the resulting estimators exhibit very different behavior and minimax global convergence rates in comparison with the solution of spatially homogeneous ill-posed problems. For example, unlike in deconvolution problem, the minimax global convergence rates are greatly influenced not only by the extent of data loss but also by the degree of spatial homogeneity of f. Specifically, even if 1/g is not integrable, one can recover f as well as in the case of an equispaced design (in terms of minimax global convergence rates) when it is homogeneous enough since the estimator is "borrowing strength" in the areas where f is adequately sampled.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.