Paper detail

Nonparametric inference for ratios of densities via uniformly valid and powerful permutation tests

We propose the density ratio permutation test, a hypothesis test that assesses whether the ratio between two densities is proportional to a known function based on independent samples from each distribution. The test uses an efficient Markov Chain Monte Carlo scheme to draw weighted permutations of the pooled data, yielding exchangeable samples and finite sample validity. For power, if the statistic is an integral probability metric, our procedure is consistent under mild assumptions on the defining function class; specializing to a reproducing kernel Hilbert space, we introduce the shifted maximum mean discrepancy and prove minimax optimality of our test when a normalized difference between the densities lies in a Sobolev ball. We extend to the case of an unknown density ratio by estimating it on an independent training sample and derive type~I error bounds in terms of the estimation error as well as power results. This allows adapting our method to conditional two sample testing, making it a versatile tool for assessing covariate-shift and related assumptions, which frequently arise in transfer learning and causal inference. Finally, we validate our theoretical findings through experiments on both simulated and real-world datasets.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.