Paper detail

Noncommutative Motives II: K-Theory and Noncommutative Motives

We continue the work initiated in arXiv:1206.3645, where we introduced a new stable symmetric monoidal $(\infty,1)$-category $SH_{nc}$ encoding a motivic stable homotopy theory for the noncommutative spaces of Kontsevich and obtained a canonical monoidal colimit-preserving functor $SH\to SH_{nc}$ relating this new theory to the $(\infty,1)$-category encoding the stable motivic $\mathbb{A}^1$ theory of Morel-Voevodsky. For a scheme $X$ this map recovers the dg-derived category of perfect complexes $L_{pe}(X)$. In this sequel we address the study of the different flavours of algebraic $K$-theory of dg-categories. As in the commutative case, these can be understood as spectral valued $\infty$-presheaves over the category of noncommutative smooth spaces and therefore provide objects in $SH_{nc}$ once properly localized. Our first main result is the description of non-connective $K$-theory of dg-categories introduced by Schlichting as the noncommutative Nisnevich sheafification of connective $K$-theory. In particular it follows that its further $\mathbb{A}^1$-localization is an object in $SH_{nc}$. As a corollary of the recent result in A. Blanc Phd thesis, we prove that this object is a unit for the monoidal structure. Using this, we obtain a precise proof for a conjecture of Kontsevich claiming that $K$-theory gives the correct mapping spaces in noncommutative motives. As a second corollary we obtain a factorization of our comparison map $SH\to SH_{nc}$ through $Mod_{KH}(SH)$ - the $(\infty,1)$-category of modules over the commutative algebra object $KH$ representing homotopy invariant algebraic $K$-theory of schemes in $SH$. If $k$ is a field admitting resolutions of singularities, this factorization is fully faithful, so that, at the motivic level, no information (below $K$-theory) is lost by passing to the noncommutative world.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.