Paper detail

Non-symmetric polarization

Let $P$ be an $m$-homogeneous polynomial in $n$-complex variables $x_1, \dotsc, x_n$. Clearly, $P$ has a unique representation in the form \begin{equation*} P(x)= \sum_{1 \leq j_1 \leq \dotsc \leq j_m \leq n} c_{(j_1, \dotsc, j_m)} \, x_{j_1} \dotsb x_{j_m} \,, \end{equation*} and the $m$"~form \begin{equation*} L_P(x^{(1)}, \dotsc, x^{(m)})= \sum_{1 \leq j_1 \leq \dotsc \leq j_m \leq n} c_{(j_1, \dotsc, j_m)} \, x^{(1)}_{j_1} \dotsb x^{(m)}_{j_m} \end{equation*} satisfies $L_P(x,\dotsc, x) = P(x)$ for every $x\in\mathbb{C}^n$. We show that, although $L_P$ in general is non-symmetric, for a large class of reasonable norms $ \lVert \cdot \rVert $ on $\mathbb{C}^n$ the norm of $L_P$ on $(\mathbb{C}^n, \lVert \cdot \rVert )^m$ up to a logarithmic term $(c \log n)^{m^2}$ can be estimated by the norm of $P$ on $ (\mathbb{C}^n, \lVert \cdot \rVert )$; here $c \ge 1$ denotes a universal constant. Moreover, for the $\ell_p$"~norms $ \lVert \cdot \rVert_p$, $1 \leq p < 2$ the logarithmic term in the number $n$ of variables is even superfluous.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.