Paper detail

Non-Stationary Reinforcement Learning: The Blessing of (More) Optimism

We consider un-discounted reinforcement learning (RL) in Markov decision processes (MDPs) under temporal drifts, ie, both the reward and state transition distributions are allowed to evolve over time, as long as their respective total variations, quantified by suitable metrics, do not exceed certain variation budgets. This setting captures the endogeneity, exogeneity, uncertainty, and partial feedback in sequential decision-making scenarios, and finds applications in vehicle remarketing and real-time bidding. We first develop the Sliding Window Upper-Confidence bound for Reinforcement Learning with Confidence Widening (SWUCRL2-CW) algorithm, and establish its dynamic regret bound when the variation budgets are known. In addition, we propose the Bandit-over-Reinforcement Learning (BORL) algorithm to adaptively tune the SWUCRL2-CW algorithm to achieve the same dynamic regret bound, but in a parameter-free manner, ie, without knowing the variation budgets. Finally, we conduct numerical experiments to show that our proposed algorithms achieve superior empirical performance compared to existing algorithms. Notably, the interplay between endogeneity and exogeneity presents a unique challenge, absent in existing (stationary and non-stationary) stochastic online learning settings, when we apply the conventional Optimism in Face of Uncertainty principle to design algorithms with provably low dynamic regret for RL in drifting MDPs. We overcome the challenge by a novel confidence widening technique that incorporates additional optimism into our learning algorithms to ensure low dynamic regret bounds. To extend our theoretical findings, we apply our framework to inventory control problems, and demonstrate how one can alternatively leverage special structures on the state transition distributions to bypass the difficulty in exploring time-varying environments.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.