Paper detail

Non-Gaussian Quasi Maximum Likelihood Estimation of GARCH Models

The non-Gaussian quasi maximum likelihood estimator is frequently used in GARCH models with intension to improve the efficiency of the GARCH parameters. However, unless the quasi-likelihood happens to be the true one, non-Gaussian QMLE methods suffers inconsistency even if shape parameters in the quasi-likelihood are estimated. To correct this bias, we identify an unknown scale parameter that is critical to the consistent estimation of non-Gaussian QMLE, and propose a two-step non-Gaussian QMLE (2SNG-QMLE) for estimation of the scale parameter and GARCH parameters. This novel approach is consistent and asymptotically normal. Moreover, it has higher efficiency than the Gaussian QMLE, particularly when the innovation error has heavy tails. Two extensions are proposed to further improve the efficiency of 2SNG-QMLE. The impact of relative heaviness of tails of the innovation and quasi-likelihood distributions on the asymptotic efficiency has been thoroughly investigated. Monte Carlo simulations and an empirical study confirm the advantages of the proposed approach.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.