Paper detail

Noether's problem for p-groups of order p^{5}

Let $k$ be any field, $p>3$ be any prime number and $G$ be a nonabelian $p$-group of order $p^{5}$. Consider the action of $G$ on the rational function field $k(x_{h}:h\in G)$ by $g\cdot x_{h}=x_{gh}$ for all $g,h\in G$. Let $e$ be the exponent of $G$. Noether's problem asks whether the fixed field $k(G)=k(x_{h}:h\in G)^{G}$ is rational (i.e., purely transcendental) over $k$. In this paper, we will prove that if $G$ does not belong to the isoclinic family $Φ_{10}$ in James's classification \cite{Jam1980} and $k$ contains a primitive $e$th root of unity, then $k(G)$ is rational over $k$. As a corollary, if $k=\textbf{C}$ is the field of complex numbers, then $\textbf{C}(G)$ is rational over $\textbf{C}$ if and only if $G$ is not in the family $Φ_{10}$. This refines a recent result of Hoshi, Kang and Kunyavskii (\cite{HKK2012}, Theorem 1.12).

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.