Paper detail

Next-to-leading-order QCD corrections to a vector bottomonium radiative decay into a charmonium

Within the framework of nonrelativistic QCD (NRQCD) factorization, we calculate the next-to-leading-order (NLO) perturbative corrections to the radiative decay $Υ\to η_c(χ_{cJ})+γ$. Both the helicity amplitudes and the helicity decay widths are obtained. It is the first computation for the processes involving both bottomonium and charmonium at two-loop accuracy. By employing the Cheng-Wu theorem, we are able to convert most of complex-valued master integrals (MIs) into real-valued MIs, which makes the numerical integration much efficient. Our results indicate the $\mathcal{O}(α_s)$ corrections are moderate for $η_c$ and $χ_{c2}$ production, and are quite marginal for $χ_{c0}$ and $χ_{c1}$ production. It is impressive to note the NLO corrections considerably reduce the renormalization scale dependence in both the decay widths and the branching fractions for $χ_{cJ}$, and slightly improve that for $η_c$. With the NRQCD matrix elements evaluated via the Buchmüller-Tye potential model, we find the decay width for $η_c$ production is one-order-of-magnitude larger than $χ_{cJ}$ production, which may provide a good opportunity to search for $Υ\to η_c+γ$ in experiment. In addition, the decay width for $χ_{c1}$ production is several times larger than those for $χ_{c0,2}$. Finally, we find the NLO NRQCD prediction for the branching fraction of $Υ\to χ_{c1}+γ$ is only half of the lower bound of the experimental data measured recently by {\tt Belle}. Moreover, there exists serious contradiction between theory and experiment for $Υ\to η_c+γ$. The discrepancies between theory and experiment deserve further research efforts.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.