Paper detail

NEAT: A Framework for Automated Exploration of Floating Point Approximations

Much recent research is devoted to exploring tradeoffs between computational accuracy and energy efficiency at different levels of the system stack. Approximation at the floating point unit (FPU) allows saving energy by simply reducing the number of computed floating point bits in return for accuracy loss. Although, finding the most energy efficient approximation for various applications with minimal effort is the main challenge. To address this issue, we propose NEAT: a pin tool that helps users automatically explore the accuracy-energy tradeoff space induced by various floating point implementations. NEAT helps programmers explore the effects of simultaneously using multiple floating point implementations to achieve the lowest energy consumption for an accuracy constraint or vice versa. NEAT accepts one or more user-defined floating point implementations and programmable placement rules for where/when to apply them. NEAT then automatically replaces floating point operations with different implementations based on the user-specified rules during the runtime and explores the resulting tradeoff space to find the best use of approximate floating point implementations for the precision tuning throughout the program. We evaluate NEAT by enforcing combinations of 24/53 different floating point implementations with three sets of placement rules on a wide range of benchmarks. We find that heuristic precision tuning at the function level provides up to 22% and 48% energy savings at 1% and 10% accuracy loss comparing to applying a single implementation for the whole application. Also, NEAT is applicable to neural networks where it finds the optimal precision level for each layer considering an accuracy target for the model.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.