Source author record

Hank Hoffmann

Hank Hoffmann appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Artificial Intelligence Cryptography and Security cs.CY Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing eess.SY Networking and Internet Architecture Systems and Control

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

7topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2021arXiv

Comparing and Combining Approximate Computing Frameworks

Approximate computing frameworks configure applications so they can operate at a range of points in an accuracy-performance trade-off space. Prior work has introduced many frameworks to create approximate programs. As approximation frameworks proliferate, it is natural to ask how they can be compared and combined to create even larger, richer trade-off spaces. We address these questions by presenting VIPER and BOA. VIPER compares trade-off spaces induced by different approximation frameworks by visualizing performance improvements across the full range of possible accuracies. BOA is a family of exploration techniques that quickly locate Pareto-efficient points in the immense trade-off space produced by the combination of two or more approximation frameworks. We use VIPER and BOA to compare and combine three different approximation frameworks from across the system stack, including: one that changes numerical precision, one that skips loop iterations, and one that manipulates existing application parameters. Compared to simply looking at Pareto-optimal curves, we find VIPER's visualizations provide a quicker and more convenient way to determine the best approximation technique for any accuracy loss. Compared to a state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithm, we find that BOA explores 14x fewer configurations yet locates 35% more Pareto-efficient points.

preprint2021arXiv

NEAT: A Framework for Automated Exploration of Floating Point Approximations

Much recent research is devoted to exploring tradeoffs between computational accuracy and energy efficiency at different levels of the system stack. Approximation at the floating point unit (FPU) allows saving energy by simply reducing the number of computed floating point bits in return for accuracy loss. Although, finding the most energy efficient approximation for various applications with minimal effort is the main challenge. To address this issue, we propose NEAT: a pin tool that helps users automatically explore the accuracy-energy tradeoff space induced by various floating point implementations. NEAT helps programmers explore the effects of simultaneously using multiple floating point implementations to achieve the lowest energy consumption for an accuracy constraint or vice versa. NEAT accepts one or more user-defined floating point implementations and programmable placement rules for where/when to apply them. NEAT then automatically replaces floating point operations with different implementations based on the user-specified rules during the runtime and explores the resulting tradeoff space to find the best use of approximate floating point implementations for the precision tuning throughout the program. We evaluate NEAT by enforcing combinations of 24/53 different floating point implementations with three sets of placement rules on a wide range of benchmarks. We find that heuristic precision tuning at the function level provides up to 22% and 48% energy savings at 1% and 10% accuracy loss comparing to applying a single implementation for the whole application. Also, NEAT is applicable to neural networks where it finds the optimal precision level for each layer considering an accuracy target for the model.

preprint2020arXiv

Grand Challenges in Resilience: Autonomous System Resilience through Design and Runtime Measures

A set of about 80 researchers, practitioners, and federal agency program managers participated in the NSF-sponsored Grand Challenges in Resilience Workshop held on Purdue campus on March 19-21, 2019. The workshop was divided into three themes: resilience in cyber, cyber-physical, and socio-technical systems. About 30 attendees in all participated in the discussions of cyber resilience. This article brings out the substantive parts of the challenges and solution approaches that were identified in the cyber resilience theme. In this article, we put forward the substantial challenges in cyber resilience in a few representative application domains and outline foundational solutions to address these challenges. These solutions fall into two broad themes: resilience-by-design and resilience-by-reaction. We use examples of autonomous systems as the application drivers motivating cyber resilience. We focus on some autonomous systems in the near horizon (autonomous ground and aerial vehicles) and also a little more distant (autonomous rescue and relief). For resilience-by-design, we focus on design methods in software that are needed for our cyber systems to be resilient. In contrast, for resilience-by-reaction, we discuss how to make systems resilient by responding, reconfiguring, or recovering at runtime when failures happen. We also discuss the notion of adaptive execution to improve resilience, execution transparently and adaptively among available execution platforms (mobile/embedded, edge, and cloud). For each of the two themes, we survey the current state, and the desired state and ways to get there. We conclude the paper by looking at the research challenges we will have to solve in the short and the mid-term to make the vision of resilient autonomous systems a reality.