Paper detail

Nearly minimax robust estimator of the mean vector by iterative spectral dimension reduction

We study the problem of robust estimation of the mean vector of a sub-Gaussian distribution. We introduce an estimator based on spectral dimension reduction (SDR) and establish a finite sample upper bound on its error that is minimax-optimal up to a logarithmic factor. Furthermore, we prove that the breakdown point of the SDR estimator is equal to $1/2$, the highest possible value of the breakdown point. In addition, the SDR estimator is equivariant by similarity transforms and has low computational complexity. More precisely, in the case of $n$ vectors of dimension $p$ -- at most $\varepsilon n$ out of which are adversarially corrupted -- the SDR estimator has a squared error of order $\big(\frac{r_Σ}{n} + \varepsilon^2\log(1/\varepsilon)\big){\log p}$ and a running time of order $p^3 + n p^2$. Here, $r_Σ\le p$ is the effective rank of the covariance matrix of the reference distribution. Another advantage of the SDR estimator is that it does not require knowledge of the contamination rate and does not involve sample splitting. We also investigate extensions of the proposed algorithm and of the obtained results in the case of (partially) unknown covariance matrix.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.