Paper detail

Nearly Minimax One-Sided Mixture-Based Sequential Tests

We focus on one-sided, mixture-based stopping rules for the problem of sequential testing a simple null hypothesis against a composite alternative. For the latter, we consider two cases---either a discrete alternative or a continuous alternative that can be embedded into an exponential family. For each case, we find a mixture-based stopping rule that is nearly minimax in the sense of minimizing the maximal Kullback-Leibler information. The proof of this result is based on finding an almost Bayes rule for an appropriate sequential decision problem and on high-order asymptotic approximations for the performance characteristics of arbitrary mixture-based stopping times. We also evaluate the asymptotic performance loss of certain intuitive mixture rules and verify the accuracy of our asymptotic approximations with simulation experiments.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.