Paper detail

Mutually nearest and mutually farthest points of sets in geodesic spaces

Let $A$ and $X$ be nonempty, bounded and closed subsets of a geodesic metric space $(E,d)$. The minimization (resp. maximization) problem denoted by $\min(A,X)$ (resp. $\max(A,X)$) consists in finding $(a_0,x_0) \in A \times X$ such that $d(a_0,x_0) = \inf\{d(a,x) : a \in A, x \in X\}$ (resp. $d(a_0,x_0) = \sup\{d(a,x) : a \in A, x \in X\}$). We study the well-posedness of these problems in different geodesic spaces considering the set $A$ fixed. Let $P_{b,cl,cv}(E)$ be the space of all nonempty, bounded, closed and convex subsets of $E$ endowed with the Pompeiu-Hausdorff distance. We show that in a space with a convex metric, curvature bounded below and the geodesic extension property, the family of sets in $P_{b,cl,cv}(E)$ for which $\max(A,X)$ is well-posed is a dense $G_δ$-set in $P_{b,cl,cv}(E)$. We give a similar result for $\min(A,X)$ without needing the geodesic extension property. Besides, we analyze the situations when one set or both sets are compact and prove some results specific to CAT$(0)$ spaces. We also prove a variant of the Drop theorem in geodesic spaces with a convex metric and apply it to obtain an optimization result for convex functions.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.