Paper detail

Mutual Visibility by Luminous Robots Without Collisions

Consider a finite set of identical computational entities that can move freely in the Euclidean plane operating in Look-Compute-Move cycles. Let p(t) denote the location of entity p at time t; entity p can see entity q at time t if at that time no other entity lies in the line segment p(t)q(t). We consider the basic problem called Mutual Visibility: starting from arbitrary distinct locations, within finite time the entities must reach, without collisions, a configuration where they all see each other. This problem must be solved by each entity autonomously executing the same algorithm. We study this problem in the "luminous robots" model; in this generalization of the standard model of oblivious robots, each entity, called "robot", has an externally visible persistent light which can assume colors from a fixed set. The case where the number of colors is c=1 corresponds to the classical model without lights. In this paper we investigate under what conditions luminous robots can solve Mutual Visibility without collisions and at what cost (i.e., with how many colors). We establish a spectrum of results, depending on the power of the adversary, on the number c of colors, and on the a-priori knowledge the robots have about the system. Among such results, we prove that Mutual Visibility can always be solved without collisions in SSynch with c=2 colors and in ASynch with c=3 colors. If an adversary can interrupt and stop a robot moving to its computed destination, Mutual Visibility is still always solvable without collisions in SSynch with c=3 colors, and, if the robots agree on the direction of one axis, also in ASynch. All the results are obtained constructively by means of novel protocols. As a byproduct of our solutions, we provide the first obstructed-visibility solutions to two classical problems for oblivious robots: Collision-less Convergence to a point and Circle Formation.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.