Paper detail

Multimodal synchrotron X-ray diffraction across the superconducting transition of Sr$_{0.1}$Bi$_2$Se$_3$

In the doped topological insulator Sr$_x$Bi$_2$Se$_3$, a pronounced in-plane two-fold symmetry is observed in electronic properties below the superconducting transition temperature $T_c \sim$ 3 K, despite the three-fold symmetry of the observed $R\bar{3}m$ space group. The axis of two-fold symmetry is nominally pinned to one of three rotational equivalent directions and crystallographic strain has been proposed to be the origin of this pinning. We carried out multimodal synchrotron diffraction and resistivity measurements down to $\sim$0.68 K and in magnetic fields up to 45 kG on a single crystal of Sr$_{0.1}$Bi$_2$Se$_3$ to probe the effect of superconductivity on the crystallographic distortion. Our results indicate that there is no in-plane crystallographic distortion at the level of $1x10^{-5}$ associated with the superconducting transition. These results further support the model that the large two-fold in-plane anisotropy of superconducting properties of Sr$_x$Bi$_2$Sr$_3$ is not structural in origin but electronic, namely it is caused by a nematic superconducting order parameter of Eu symmetry.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.