Paper detail

Multi-task Learning for Concurrent Prediction of Thermal Comfort, Sensation, and Preference

Indoor thermal comfort immensely impacts the health and performance of occupants. Therefore, researchers and engineers have proposed numerous computational models to estimate thermal comfort (TC). Given the impetus toward energy efficiency, the current focus is on data-driven TC prediction solutions that leverage state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) algorithms. However, an indoor occupant's perception of indoor thermal comfort (TC) is subjective and multi-dimensional. Different aspects of TC are represented by various standard metrics/scales viz., thermal sensation (TSV), thermal comfort (TCV), and thermal preference (TPV). The current ML-based TC prediction solutions adopt the Single-task Learning approach, i.e., one prediction model per metric. Consequently, solutions often focus on only one TC metric. Moreover, when several metrics are considered, multiple TC models for a single indoor space lead to conflicting predictions, making real-world deployment infeasible. This work addresses these problems. With the vision toward energy conservation and real-world application, naturally ventilated primary school classrooms are considered. First, month-long field experiments are conducted in 5 schools and 14 classrooms, including 512 unique student participants. Further, "DeepComfort," a Multi-task Learning inspired deep-learning model is proposed. DeepComfort predicts multiple TC output metrics viz., TSV, TPV, and TCV, simultaneously, through a single model. It demonstrates high F1-scores, Accuracy (>90%), and generalization capability when validated on the ASHRAE-II database and the dataset created in this study. DeepComfort is also shown to outperform 6 popular metric-specific single-task machine learning algorithms. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first application of Multi-task Learning to thermal comfort prediction in classrooms.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.