Paper detail

Multi-Scale Zero-Order Optimization of Smooth Functions in an RKHS

We aim to optimize a black-box function $f:\mathcal{X} \mapsto \mathbb{R}$ under the assumption that $f$ is Hölder smooth and has bounded norm in the RKHS associated with a given kernel $K$. This problem is known to have an agnostic Gaussian Process (GP) bandit interpretation in which an appropriately constructed GP surrogate model with kernel $K$ is used to obtain an upper confidence bound (UCB) algorithm. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm (\texttt{LP-GP-UCB}) where the usual GP surrogate model is augmented with Local Polynomial (LP) estimators of the Hölder smooth function $f$ to construct a multi-scale UCB guiding the search for the optimizer. We analyze this algorithm and derive high probability bounds on its simple and cumulative regret. We then prove that the elements of many common RKHS are Hölder smooth and obtain the corresponding Hölder smoothness parameters, and hence, specialize our regret bounds for several commonly used kernels. When specialized to the Squared Exponential (SE) kernel, \texttt{LP-GP-UCB} matches the optimal performance, while for the case of Matérn kernels $(K_ν)_{ν>0}$, it results in uniformly tighter regret bounds for all values of the smoothness parameter $ν>0$. Most notably, for certain ranges of $ν$, the algorithm achieves near-optimal bounds on simple and cumulative regrets, matching the algorithm-independent lower bounds up to polylog factors, and thus closing the large gap between the existing upper and lower bounds for these values of $ν$. Additionally, our analysis provides the first explicit regret bounds, in terms of the budget $n$, for the Rational-Quadratic (RQ) and Gamma-Exponential (GE). Finally, experiments with synthetic functions as well as a CNN hyperparameter tuning task demonstrate the practical benefits of our multi-scale partitioning approach over some existing algorithms numerically.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.