Paper detail

Morphological and non-equilibrium analysis of coupled Rayleigh-Taylor-Kelvin-Helmholtz instability

In this paper, the coupled Rayleigh-Taylor-Kelvin-Helmholtz instability(RTI, KHI and RTKHI, respectively) system is investigated using a multiple-relaxation-time discrete Boltzmann model. Both the morphological boundary length and thermodynamic nonequilibrium (TNE) strength are introduced to probe the complex configurations and kinetic processes. In the simulations, RTI always plays a major role in the later stage, while the main mechanism in the early stage depends on the comparison of buoyancy and shear strength. It is found that, both the total boundary length $L$ of the condensed temperature field and the mean heat flux strength $D_{3,1}$ can be used to measure the ratio of buoyancy to shear strength, and to quantitatively judge the main mechanism in the early stage of the RTKHI system. Specifically, when KHI (RTI) dominates, $L^{KHI} > L^{RTI}$ ($L^{KHI} < L^{RTI}$), $D_{3,1}^{KHI} > D_{3,1}^{RTI}$ ($D_{3,1}^{KHI} < D_{3,1}^{RTI}$); when KHI and RTI are balanced, $L^{KHI} = L^{RTI}$, $D_{3,1}^{KHI} = D_{3,1}^{RTI}$. A second sets of findings are as below: For the case where the KHI dominates at earlier time and the RTI dominates at later time, the evolution process can be roughly divided into two stages. Before the transition point of the two stages, $L^{RTKHI}$ initially increases exponentially, and then increases linearly. Hence, the ending point of linear increasing $L^{RTKHI}$ can work as a geometric criterion for discriminating the two stages. The TNE quantity, heat flux strength $D_{3,1}^{RTKHI}$, shows similar behavior. Therefore, the ending point of linear increasing $D_{3,1}^{RTKHI}$ can work as a physical criterion for discriminating the two stages.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.