Paper detail

Moravcsik's theorem on complete sets of polarization observables reexamined

We revisit Moravcsik's theorem on the unique extraction of amplitudes from polarization observables, which has been originally published in 1985. The proof is (re-) written in a more formal and detailed way and the theorem is corrected for the special case of an odd number of amplitudes (this case was treated incorrectly in the original publication). Moravcsik's theorem, in the modified form, can be applied in principle to the extraction of an arbitrary number of $N$ helicity amplitudes. The uniqueness theorem is then applied to hadronic reactions involving particles with spin. The most basic example is Pion-Nucleon scattering ($N=2$), the first non-trivial example is pseudoscalar meson photoproduction ($N=4$) and the most technically involved case treated here is given by pseudoscalar meson electroproduction ($N=6$). The application of Moravcsik's theorem to electroproduction yields new results, which for the first time provide insights into the structure and content of complete sets for this particular process. The uniqueness-statements for the various reactions are compared and an attempt is made to recognize general patterns, which emerge under the application of the theorem.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.