Paper detail

Meta Learning for High-dimensional Ising Model Selection Using $\ell_1$-regularized Logistic Regression

In this paper, we consider the meta learning problem for estimating the graphs associated with high-dimensional Ising models, using the method of $\ell_1$-regularized logistic regression for neighborhood selection of each node. Our goal is to use the information learned from the auxiliary tasks in the learning of the novel task to reduce its sufficient sample complexity. To this end, we propose a novel generative model as well as an improper estimation method. In our setting, all the tasks are \emph{similar} in their \emph{random} model parameters and supports. By pooling all the samples from the auxiliary tasks to \emph{improperly} estimate a single parameter vector, we can recover the true support union, assumed small in size, with a high probability with a sufficient sample complexity of $Ω(1) $ per task, for $K = Ω(d^3 \log p ) $ tasks of Ising models with $p$ nodes and a maximum neighborhood size $d$. Then, with the support for the novel task restricted to the estimated support union, we prove that consistent neighborhood selection for the novel task can be obtained with a reduced sufficient sample complexity of $Ω(d^3 \log d)$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.