Paper detail

Measuring the Neutrino Event Time in Liquid Argon by a Post-Reconstruction One-parameter Fit

We propose a relatively simple method to measure the event time in liquid Argon (LAr) TPC-based neutrino detectors that takes advantage of the topological reconstruction of each event from the TPC data prior to performing a one-parameter fit. Measured times and positions of detected photons are fit to the expected pattern of light from the tracks as reconstructed using the electron drift. The event can be treated as a rigid body with only the neutrino interaction time as a free parameter. The optical properties of LAr are comparable to those of water for Cherenkov light in visible wavelengths. Data-Monte Carlo comparisons of the light patterns, given the known track topology from electron drift, enable in situ calibration of the optical model and further optimization of the timing. A back-of-the-envelope calculation predicts that the single parameter fit for the interaction time requires a significantly lower photodetector coverage than needed for the same precision in conventional warm-liquid detectors.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.