Paper detail

Measurement of the Penetration Depth and Coherence Length of MgB$_\text{2}$ in All Directions Using Transmission Electron Microscopy

We demonstrate that images of flux vortices in a superconductor taken with a transmission electron microscope can be used to measure the penetration depth and coherence length in all directions at the same temperature and magnetic field. This is particularly useful for MgB$_2$, where these quantities vary with the applied magnetic field and values are difficult to obtain at low field or in the $c$-direction. We obtained images of flux vortices from an MgB$_2$ single crystal cut in the $ac$ plane by focussed ion beam milling and tilted to $45^\circ$ with respect to the electron beam about its $a$ axis. A new method was developed to simulate these images which accounted for vortices with a non-zero core in a thin, anisotropic superconductor and a simplex algorithm was used to make a quantitative comparison between the images and simulations to measure the penetration depths and coherence lengths. This gave penetration depths $Λ_{ab}=100\pm 35$ nm and $Λ_c=120\pm 15$ nm at 10.8 K in a field of 4.8 mT. The large error in $Λ_{ab}$ is a consequence of tilting the sample about $a$ and had it been tilted about $c$, the errors would be reversed. Thus, obtaining the most precise values requires taking images of the flux lattice with the sample tilted in more than one direction. In a previous paper, we obtained a more precise value using a sample cut in the $ab$ plane. Using this value gives $Λ_{ab}=107\pm 8$ nm, $Λ_c=120\pm 15$ nm, $ξ_{ab}=39\pm 11$ nm and $ξ_c=35\pm 10$ nm which agree well with measurements made using other techniques. The experiment required two days to conduct and does not require large-scale facilities. It was performed on a very small sample: $30\times 15$ microns and 200 nm thick so this method could prove useful for characterising new superconductors where only small single crystals are available.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.