Paper detail

Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Totally Positive Log-Concave Densities

We study nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation for two classes of multivariate distributions that imply strong forms of positive dependence; namely log-supermodular (MTP$_2$) distributions and log-$L^\#$-concave (LLC) distributions. In both cases we also assume log-concavity in order to ensure boundedness of the likelihood function. Given $n$ independent and identically distributed random vectors in $\mathbb R^d$ from one of our distributions, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) exists a.s. and is unique a.e. with probability one when $n\geq 3$. This holds independently of the ambient dimension $d$. We conjecture that the MLE is always the exponential of a tent function. We prove this result for samples in $\{0,1\}^d$ or in $\mathbb{R}^2$ under MTP$_2$, and for samples in $\mathbb{Q}^d$ under LLC. Finally, we provide a conditional gradient algorithm for computing the maximum likelihood estimate.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.