Paper detail

Magnetic Uncertainties for Compact Kibble Balances: An Investigation

The Kibble balance has become one of the major instruments for realizing the mass unit, the kilogram, in the revised international system of units (SI). Researchers at about a dozen national metrology institutes are actively working with Kibble balances that are capable of weighing masses with nominal values from 10g to 1kg. In the future, the design of smaller Kibble balances will play a more significant role. Smaller Kibble balances require smaller magnet systems, and here we investigate the scaling of systematic uncertainties with the size of the magnet system. We describe the size dependence of three magnetic effects: the coil-inductance effect, the yoke nonlinear effect, and the thermal effect. The analysis shows that the relative systematic effects become increasingly larger with smaller sizes. For small magnets the thermal effects become dominant and, hence, a good thermal design is imperative.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.