Paper detail

LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Conceptual Design Report

The design and performance of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) detector is described as of March 2015 in this Conceptual Design Report. LZ is a second-generation dark-matter detector with the potential for unprecedented sensitivity to weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) of masses from a few GeV/c2 to hundreds of TeV/c2. With total liquid xenon mass of about 10 tonnes, LZ will be the most sensitive experiment for WIMPs in this mass region by the end of the decade. This report describes in detail the design of the LZ technical systems. Expected backgrounds are quantified and the performance of the experiment is presented. The LZ detector will be located at the Sanford Underground Research Facility in South Dakota. The organization of the LZ Project and a summary of the expected cost and current schedule are given.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
The LZ CollaborationD. S. AkeribC. W. AkerlofD. Yu. AkimovS. K. AlsumH. M. AraújoX. BaiA. J. BaileyJ. BalajthyS. BalashovM. J. BarryP. BauerP. BeltrameE. P. BernardA. BernsteinT. P. BiesiadzinskiK. E. BoastA. I. BolozdynyaE. M. BoultonR. BramanteJ. H. BuckleyV. V. BugaevR. BunkerS. BurdinJ. K. BusenitzC. CarelsD. L. CarlsmithB. CarlsonM. C. Carmona-BenitezM. CascellaC. ChanJ. J. CherwinkaA. A. ChillerC. ChillerW. W. CraddockA. CurrieJ. E. CutterJ. P. da CunhaC. E. DahlS. DasuT. J. R. DavisonL. de ViveirosA. DobiJ. E. Y. DobsonE. DruszkiewiczT. K. EdbergB. N. EdwardsW. R. EdwardsM. M. ElnimrW. T. EmmetC. H. FahamS. FiorucciP. FordV. B. FrancisC. FuR. J. GaitskellN. J. GantosV. M. GehmanR. M. GerhardC. GhagM. G. D. GilchrieseB. GomberC. R. HallA. HarrisS. J. HaselschwardtS. A. HertelM. D. HoffB. HolbrookE. HoltomD. Q. HuangT. W. HurteauC. M. IgnarraR. G. JacobsenW. JiX. JiM. JohnsonY. JuK. KamdinK. KazkazD. KhaitanA. KhazovA. V. KhromovA. M. KonovalovE. V. KorolkovaH. KrausH. J. KrebsV. A. KudryavtsevA. V. KumpanS. KyreN. A. LarsenC. LeeB. G. LenardoK. T. LeskoF. -T. LiaoJ. LinA. LindoteW. H. LippincottJ. LiuX. LiuM. I. LopesW. LorenzonS. LuitzP. MajewskiD. C. MallingA. G. ManalaysayL. ManentiR. L. ManninoD. J. MarkleyT. J. MartinM. F. MarzioniD. N. McKinseyD. -M. MeiY. MengE. H. MillerJ. MockM. E. MonzaniJ. A. MoradA. St. J. MurphyH. N. NelsonF. NevesJ. A. NikkelF. G. O'NeillJ. O'DellK. O'SullivanM. A. OlevitchK. C. Oliver-MalloryK. J. PalladinoM. PangilinanS. J. PattonE. K. PeaseA. PiepkeS. PowellR. M. PreeceK. PushkinB. N. RatcliffJ. ReichenbacherL. ReichhartC. RhyneJ. P. RodriguesH. J. RoseR. RoseroJ. S. SabaM. SarychevR. W. SchneeM. S. G. SchubnellP. R. ScovellS. ShawT. A. ShuttC. SilvaK. SkarpaasW. SkulskiV. N. SolovovP. SorensenV. V. SosnovtsevI. StancuM. R. StarkS. StephensonT. M. StieglerT. J. SumnerK. SundarnathM. SzydagisD. J. TaylorW. TaylorB. P. TennysonP. A. TermanK. J. ThomasJ. A. ThomsonD. R. TiedtW. H. ToA. TomásM. TripathiC. E. TullL. TvrznikovaS. UvarovJ. Va'vraM. G. D. van der GrintenJ. R. VerbusC. O. VuosaloW. L. WaldronL. WangR. C. WebbW. -Z. WeiM. WhileD. T. WhiteT. J. WhitisW. J. WisniewskiM. S. WitherellF. L. H. WolfsE. WoodsD. WoodwardS. D. WormM. YehJ. YinS. K. YoungC. Zhang
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

The LZ CollaborationD. S. AkeribC. W. AkerlofD. Yu. AkimovS. K. AlsumH. M. AraújoX. BaiA. J. BaileyJ. BalajthyS. BalashovM. J. BarryP. BauerP. BeltrameE. P. BernardA. BernsteinT. P. BiesiadzinskiK. E. BoastA. I. BolozdynyaE. M. BoultonR. BramanteJ. H. BuckleyV. V. BugaevR. BunkerS. BurdinJ. K. BusenitzC. CarelsD. L. CarlsmithB. CarlsonM. C. Carmona-BenitezM. CascellaC. ChanJ. J. CherwinkaA. A. ChillerC. ChillerW. W. CraddockA. CurrieJ. E. CutterJ. P. da CunhaC. E. DahlS. DasuT. J. R. DavisonL. de ViveirosA. DobiJ. E. Y. DobsonE. DruszkiewiczT. K. EdbergB. N. EdwardsW. R. EdwardsM. M. ElnimrW. T. EmmetC. H. FahamS. FiorucciP. FordV. B. FrancisC. FuR. J. GaitskellN. J. GantosV. M. GehmanR. M. GerhardC. GhagM. G. D. GilchrieseB. GomberC. R. HallA. HarrisS. J. HaselschwardtS. A. HertelM. D. HoffB. HolbrookE. HoltomD. Q. HuangT. W. HurteauC. M. IgnarraR. G. JacobsenW. JiX. JiM. JohnsonY. JuK. KamdinK. KazkazD. KhaitanA. KhazovA. V. KhromovA. M. KonovalovE. V. KorolkovaH. KrausH. J. KrebsV. A. KudryavtsevA. V. KumpanS. KyreN. A. LarsenC. LeeB. G. LenardoK. T. LeskoF. -T. LiaoJ. LinA. LindoteW. H. LippincottJ. LiuX. LiuM. I. LopesW. LorenzonS. LuitzP. MajewskiD. C. MallingA. G. ManalaysayL. ManentiR. L. ManninoD. J. MarkleyT. J. MartinM. F. MarzioniD. N. McKinseyD. -M. MeiY. MengE. H. MillerJ. MockM. E. MonzaniJ. A. MoradA. St. J. MurphyH. N. NelsonF. NevesJ. A. NikkelF. G. O'NeillJ. O'DellK. O'SullivanM. A. OlevitchK. C. Oliver-MalloryK. J. PalladinoM. PangilinanS. J. PattonE. K. PeaseA. PiepkeS. PowellR. M. PreeceK. PushkinB. N. RatcliffJ. ReichenbacherL. ReichhartC. RhyneJ. P. RodriguesH. J. RoseR. RoseroJ. S. SabaM. SarychevR. W. SchneeM. S. G. SchubnellP. R. ScovellS. ShawT. A. ShuttC. SilvaK. SkarpaasW. SkulskiV. N. SolovovP. SorensenV. V. SosnovtsevI. StancuM. R. StarkS. StephensonT. M. StieglerT. J. SumnerK. SundarnathM. SzydagisD. J. TaylorW. TaylorB. P. TennysonP. A. TermanK. J. ThomasJ. A. ThomsonD. R. TiedtW. H. ToA. TomásM. TripathiC. E. TullL. TvrznikovaS. UvarovJ. Va'vraM. G. D. van der GrintenJ. R. VerbusC. O. VuosaloW. L. WaldronL. WangR. C. WebbW. -Z. WeiM. WhileD. T. WhiteT. J. WhitisW. J. WisniewskiM. S. WitherellF. L. H. WolfsE. WoodsD. WoodwardS. D. WormM. YehJ. YinS. K. YoungC. Zhang

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.