Paper detail

Localized geometry detection in scale-free random graphs

We consider the problem of detecting whether a power-law inhomogeneous random graph contains a geometric community, and we frame this as an hypothesis testing problem. More precisely, we assume that we are given a sample from an unknown distribution on the space of graphs on n vertices. Under the null hypothesis, the sample originates from the inhomogeneous random graph with a heavy-tailed degree sequence. Under the alternative hypothesis, $k = o(n)$ vertices are given spatial locations and connect between each other following the geometric inhomogeneous random graph connection rule. The remaining $n-k$ vertices follow the inhomogeneous random graph connection rule. We propose a simple and efficient test, which is based on counting normalized triangles, to differentiate between the two hypotheses. We prove that our test correctly detects the presence of the community with high probability as $n \to \infty$, and identifies large-degree vertices of the community with high probability.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.