BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Clara Stegehuis

Clara Stegehuis contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.PRmath.COmath.STphysics.soc-phSocial and Information NetworksStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Uniformly sampling random directed hypergraphs with fixed degrees

Many complex systems show non-pairwise interactions, which can be captured by hypergraphs. In this work, we propose an edge-swapping method to sample random directed hypergraphs with fixed vertex and hyperarc degrees, which can be applied to different classes of directed hypergraphs (containing self-loops, degenerate hyperarcs and/or multi-hyperarcs). We prove that this method indeed samples uniformly from the classes with self-loops and multi-hyperarcs, and that the method may not sample uniformly from classes without self-loops, or with self-loops and degenerate hyperarcs but without multi-hyperarcs. We present a partial result on the class with self-loops, but without degenerate hyperarcs or multi-hyperarcs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Localized geometry detection in scale-free random graphs

We consider the problem of detecting whether a power-law inhomogeneous random graph contains a geometric community, and we frame this as an hypothesis testing problem. More precisely, we assume that we are given a sample from an unknown distribution on the space of graphs on n vertices. Under the null hypothesis, the sample originates from the inhomogeneous random graph with a heavy-tailed degree sequence. Under the alternative hypothesis, $k = o(n)$ vertices are given spatial locations and connect between each other following the geometric inhomogeneous random graph connection rule. The remaining $n-k$ vertices follow the inhomogeneous random graph connection rule. We propose a simple and efficient test, which is based on counting normalized triangles, to differentiate between the two hypotheses. We prove that our test correctly detects the presence of the community with high probability as $n \to \infty$, and identifies large-degree vertices of the community with high probability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Cliques in geometric inhomogeneous random graph

Many real-world networks were found to be highly clustered, and contain a large amount of small cliques. We here investigate the number of cliques of any size k contained in a geometric inhomogeneous random graph: a scale-free network model containing geometry. The interplay between scale-freeness and geometry ensures that connections are likely to form between either high-degree vertices, or between close by vertices. At the same time it is rare for a vertex to have a high degree, and most vertices are not close to one another. This trade-off makes cliques more likely to appear between specific vertices. In this paper, we formalize this trade-off and prove that there exists a typical type of clique in terms of the degrees and the positions of the vertices that span the clique. Moreover, we show that the asymptotic number of cliques as well as the typical clique type undergoes a phase transition, in which only k and the degree-exponent tau are involved. Interestingly, this phase transition shows that for small values of tau, the underlying geometry of the model is irrelevant: the number of cliques scales the same as in a non-geometric network

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Distinguishing power-law uniform random graphs from inhomogeneous random graphs through small subgraphs

We investigate the asymptotic number of induced subgraphs in power-law uniform random graphs. We show that these induced subgraphs appear typically on vertices with specific degrees, which are found by solving an optimization problem. Furthermore, we show that this optimization problem allows to design a linear-time, randomized algorithm that distinguishes between uniform random graphs and random graph models that create graphs with approximately a desired degree sequence: the power-law rank-1 inhomogeneous random graph. This algorithm uses the fact that some specific induced subgraphs appear significantly more often in uniform random graphs than in rank-1 inhomogeneous random graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Closure coefficients in scale-free complex networks

The formation of triangles in complex networks is an important network property that has received tremendous attention. The formation of triangles is often studied through the clustering coefficient. The closure coefficient or transitivity is another method to measure triadic closure. This statistic measures clustering from the head node of a triangle (instead of from the center node, as in the often studied clustering coefficient). We perform a first exploratory analysis of the behavior of the local closure coefficient in two random graph models that create simple networks with power-law degrees: the hidden-variable model and the hyperbolic random graph. We show that the closure coefficient behaves significantly different in these simple random graph models than in the previously studied multigraph models. We also relate the closure coefficient of high-degree vertices to the clustering coefficient and the average nearest neighbor degree.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Optimal subgraph structures in scale-free configuration models

Subgraphs reveal information about the geometry and functionalities of complex networks. For scale-free networks with unbounded degree fluctuations, we obtain the asymptotics of the number of times a small connected graph occurs as a subgraph or as an induced subgraph. We obtain these results by analyzing the configuration model with degree exponent $τ\in(2,3)$ and introducing a novel class of optimization problems. For any given subgraph, the unique optimizer describes the degrees of the vertices that together span the subgraph. We find that subgraphs typically occur between vertices with specific degree ranges. In this way, we can count and characterize {\it all} subgraphs. We refrain from double counting in the case of multi-edges, essentially counting the subgraphs in the {\it erased} configuration model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Subgraphs in preferential attachment models

We consider subgraph counts in general preferential attachment models with power-law degree exponent $τ>2$. For all subgraphs $H$, we find the scaling of the expected number of subgraphs as a power of the number of vertices. We prove our results on the expected number of subgraphs by defining an optimization problem that finds the optimal subgraph structure in terms of the indices of the vertices that together span it and by using the representation of the preferential attachment model as a Pólya urn model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access