Paper detail

Localized covariance estimation: A Bayesian perspective

A major problem in numerical weather prediction (NWP) is the estimation of high-dimensional covariance matrices from a small number of samples. Maximum likelihood estimators cannot provide reliable estimates when the overall dimension is much larger than the number of samples. Fortunately, NWP practitioners have found ingenious ways to boost the accuracy of their covariance estimators by leveraging the assumption that the correlations decay with spatial distance. In this work, Bayesian statistics is used to provide a new justification and analysis of the practical NWP covariance estimators. The Bayesian framework involves manipulating distributions over symmetric positive definite matrices, and it leads to two main findings: (i) the commonly used "hybrid estimator" for the covariance matrix has a naturally Bayesian interpretation; (ii) the very commonly used "Schur product estimator" is not Bayesian, but it can be studied and understood within the Bayesian framework. As practical implications, the Bayesian framework shows how to reduce the amount of tuning required for covariance estimation, and it suggests that efficient covariance estimation should be rooted in understanding and penalizing conditional correlations, rather than correlations.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.