Paper detail

Linear models based on noisy data and the Frisch scheme

We address the problem of identifying linear relations among variables based on noisy measurements. This is, of course, a central question in problems involving "Big Data." Often a key assumption is that measurement errors in each variable are independent. This precise formulation has its roots in the work of Charles Spearman in 1904 and of Ragnar Frisch in the 1930's. Various topics such as errors-in-variables, factor analysis, and instrumental variables, all refer to alternative formulations of the problem of how to account for the anticipated way that noise enters in the data. In the present paper we begin by describing the basic theory and provide alternative modern proofs to some key results. We then go on to consider certain generalizations of the theory as well applying certain novel numerical techniques to the problem. A central role is played by the Frisch-Kalman dictum which aims at a noise contribution that allows a maximal set of simultaneous linear relations among the noise-free variables --a rank minimization problem. In the years since Frisch's original formulation, there have been several insights including trace minimization as a convenient heuristic to replace rank minimization. We discuss convex relaxations and certificates guaranteeing global optimality. A complementary point of view to the Frisch-Kalman dictum is introduced in which models lead to a min-max quadratic estimation error for the error-free variables. Points of contact between the two formalisms are discussed and various alternative regularization schemes are indicated.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.