Paper detail

Light outputs of yttrium doped BaF$_2$ crystals irradiated with neutrons

The fast luminescence component of barium fluoride (BaF$_2$) crystals with a subnanosecond decay time can find wide application in particle physics and nuclear physics. However, the slow luminescence component with the 630~ns decay time could cause pile-up signals at a high rate environment. Doping of BaF$_2$ crystals with rare earth elements suppresses the slow emission component, but at the same time the radiation hardness of the crystals deteriorates. This work presents the results of studying crystal samples, both pure BaF$_2$ and those doped with yttrium in a proportion of 1at.\%Y, 3at.\%Y and 5at.\%Y, irradiated with a fast neutron fluence of about 2.3$\times$10$^{14}$~n/cm$^2$. Their light output and decay kinetics were measured before and after irradiation. It is found that the light output loss of a pure BaF$_2$ crystal after irradiation is about 7\%, and the light output loss of yttrium doped samples after irradiation is about two times higher. The measurement results demonstrate that after irradiation the fast component of each sample has a relative light output loss 2-3\% larger than the slow one.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.