Paper detail

LHC Phenomenology of Type II Seesaw: Nondegenerate Case

In this paper, we thoroughly investigate the LHC phenomenology of the type II seesaw mechanism for neutrino masses in the nondegenerate case where the triplet scalars of various charge ($H^{\pm\pm}, H^\pm, H^0, A^0$) have different masses. Compared with the degenerate case, the cascade decays of scalars lead to many new, interesting signal channels. In the positive scenario where $M_{H^{\pm\pm}}<M_{H^\pm}<M_{H^0/A^0}$, the four-lepton signal is still the most promising discovery channel for the doubly-charged scalars $H^{\pm\pm}$. The five-lepton signal is crucial to probe the mass spectrum of the scalars, for which, for example, a $5σ$ reach at 14 TeV LHC for $M_{H^{\pm}}=430 GeV$ with $M_{H^{\pm\pm}}=400 GeV$ requires an integrated luminosity of 76/fb. And the six-lepton signal can be used to probe the neutral scalars $H^0/A^0$, which are usually hard to detect in the degenerate case. In the negative scenario where $M_{H^{\pm\pm}}>M_{H^\pm}>M_{H^0/A^0}$, the detection of $H^{\pm\pm}$ is more challenging, when the cascade decay $H^{\pm\pm}\to H^{\pm}W^{\pm*}$ is dominant. The most important channel is the associated $H^{\pm}H^0/A^0$ production in the final state $\ell^\pm\cancel{E}_Tb\bar{b}b\bar{b}$, which requires a luminosity of 109/fb for a $5σ$ discovery, while the final state $\ell^\pm\cancel{E}_Tb\bar{b}τ^+τ^-$ is less promising. Moreover, the associated $H^0A^0$ production can give same signals as the standard model Higgs pair production. With a much larger cross section, the $H^0A^0$ production in the final state $b\bar{b}τ^+τ^-$ could reach $3σ$ significance at 14 TeV LHC with a luminosity of 300/fb. In summary, with an integrated luminosity of order 500/fb, the triplet scalars can be fully reconstructed at 14 TeV LHC in the negative scenario.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.