Paper detail

Learning to Adapt Clinical Sequences with Residual Mixture of Experts

Clinical event sequences in Electronic Health Records (EHRs) record detailed information about the patient condition and patient care as they occur in time. Recent years have witnessed increased interest of machine learning community in developing machine learning models solving different types of problems defined upon information in EHRs. More recently, neural sequential models, such as RNN and LSTM, became popular and widely applied models for representing patient sequence data and for predicting future events or outcomes based on such data. However, a single neural sequential model may not properly represent complex dynamics of all patients and the differences in their behaviors. In this work, we aim to alleviate this limitation by refining a one-fits-all model using a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture. The architecture consists of multiple (expert) RNN models covering patient sub-populations and refining the predictions of the base model. That is, instead of training expert RNN models from scratch we define them on the residual signal that attempts to model the differences from the population-wide model. The heterogeneity of various patient sequences is modeled through multiple experts that consist of RNN. Particularly, instead of directly training MoE from scratch, we augment MoE based on the prediction signal from pretrained base GRU model. With this way, the mixture of experts can provide flexible adaptation to the (limited) predictive power of the single base RNN model. We experiment with the newly proposed model on real-world EHRs data and the multivariate clinical event prediction task. We implement RNN using Gated Recurrent Units (GRU). We show 4.1% gain on AUPRC statistics compared to a single RNN prediction.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.