Paper detail

Lattice stability and formation energies of intrinsic defects in Mg2Si and Mg2Ge via first principles simulations

We report an ab initio study of the semiconducting Mg2X (with X = Si, Ge) compounds and in particular we analyze the formation energy of the different point defects with the aim to understand the intrinsic doping mechanisms. We find that the formation energy of Mg2Ge is 50 % larger than the one of Mg2Si, in agreement with the experimental tendency. From the study of the stability and the electronic properties of the most stable defects taking into account the growth conditions, we show that the main reason for the n-doping in these materials comes from interstitial magnesium defects. Conversely, since other defects acting like acceptors such as Mg vacancies or multivacancies are more stable in Mg2Ge than in Mg2Si, this explains why Mg2Ge can be of n or p type, contrary to Mg2Si. The finding that the most stable defects are different in Mg2Si and Mg2Ge and depend on the growth conditions is important and must be taken into account in the search of the optimal doping to improve the thermoelectric properties of these materials.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.