Paper detail

Lambda-Lambda interaction from two-particle intensity correlation in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

We investigate $ΛΛ$ interaction dependence of the $ΛΛ$ intensity correlation in high-energy heavy-ion collisions. By analyzing the correlation data recently obtained by the STAR collaboration based on theoretically proposed $ΛΛ$ interactions, we give a constraint on the $ΛΛ$ scattering length, $-1.25~\text{fm} < a_0 < 0$, suggesting that $ΛΛ$ interaction is weakly attractive and there is no loosely bound state. In addition to the fermionic quantum statistics and the $ΛΛ$ interaction, effects of collective flow, feed-down from $Σ^0$, and the residual source are also found to be important to understand the data. We demonstrate that the correlation data favor negative $ΛΛ$ scattering length with the pair purity parameter $λ=(0.67)^2$ evaluated by using experimental data on the $Σ^0/Λ$ ratio, while the positive scattering length could be favored when we regard $λ$ as a free fitting parameter.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.