Paper detail

K-NN active learning under local smoothness assumption

There is a large body of work on convergence rates either in passive or active learning. Here we first outline some of the main results that have been obtained, more specifically in a nonparametric setting under assumptions about the smoothness of the regression function (or the boundary between classes) and the margin noise. We discuss the relative merits of these underlying assumptions by putting active learning in perspective with recent work on passive learning. We design an active learning algorithm with a rate of convergence better than in passive learning, using a particular smoothness assumption customized for k-nearest neighbors. Unlike previous active learning algorithms, we use a smoothness assumption that provides a dependence on the marginal distribution of the instance space. Additionally, our algorithm avoids the strong density assumption that supposes the existence of the density function of the marginal distribution of the instance space and is therefore more generally applicable.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.